The Supreme Court of India
Chambers of Ankur Singhal

Litigation & Appellate Advocacy

A litigation practice based in New Delhi, appearing before the Supreme Court of India, the Delhi High Court and tribunals.

Ankur Singhal, Advocate
Ankur Singhal, Advocate
Profile

Ankur Singhal is an advocate based in New Delhi. His practice spans civil, commercial and constitutional litigation, arbitration, insolvency, company and securities law, public tenders, regulatory disputes and public law matters.

He has appeared and assisted in matters before the Supreme Court of India, the Delhi High Court and tribunals. He was most recently associated with the Chambers of Mr. Shyam Divan, Senior Advocate, and was earlier an advocate at Ashim Sood Law Offices. He served as Law Clerk-cum-Research Associate to Hon’ble Justice K.M. Joseph at the Supreme Court of India, and is empanelled as Assisting Counsel with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee.

Read full profile

Practice Areas

What the Chambers handles.

01

Arbitration

Invocation, pleadings and applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and related court proceedings.

02

Commercial Litigation

Contractual, property and recovery disputes, and commercial suits and appeals across trial and appellate forums.

03

Constitutional & Public Law

Writ petitions, public-interest litigation, and matters of fundamental rights, federalism and the judicial review of State action.

04

Insolvency & Bankruptcy

Corporate insolvency resolution and liquidation proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, before the NCLT, NCLAT and the Supreme Court of India.

05

Intellectual Property & Technology Law

Infringement and passing-off suits in trademark and copyright, and questions at the intersection of law and technology.

06

White-Collar & Enforcement Matters

Economic-offence and enforcement proceedings, including matters connected with attachment and money-laundering allegations.

View all practice areas

Experience

An overview.

Judicial Clerkship

Supreme Court of India

Law Clerk-cum-Research Associate to Hon’ble Justice K.M. Joseph, Supreme Court of India.

Litigation Experience

Chambers & offices

Most recently associated with the Chambers of Mr. Shyam Divan, Senior Advocate, and earlier with Ashim Sood Law Offices. Empanelled as Assisting Counsel with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee.

Education

Berkeley · NLSIU

LL.M., University of California, Berkeley; B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), National Law School of India University.

About

A brief profile

Ankur Singhal, Advocate
Ankur Singhal, Advocate
LinkedIn

Ankur Singhal is an advocate practising before the Supreme Court of India, the Delhi High Court and tribunals. His work focuses on civil, commercial and constitutional litigation, with experience across arbitration, insolvency, securities regulation, public law, public tenders and white-collar matters.

Ankur graduated from the National Law School of India University, Bangalore, after securing All India Rank 3 in the Common Law Admission Test, 2016. From July 2021 to June 2023, he served as Law Clerk-cum-Research Associate to Hon’ble Justice K.M. Joseph at the Supreme Court of India, working across questions of constitutional interpretation, commercial and insolvency law, arbitration and the judicial review of government action.

He holds an LL.M. from the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, where he completed a Certificate of Specialisation in Law and Technology, with a focus on international litigation and arbitration, antitrust and digital-market regulation, and intellectual property, and received the Award for Best Legal Memorandum in Legal Research and Writing.

He was most recently associated with the Chambers of Mr. Shyam Divan, Senior Advocate, and was earlier an advocate at Ashim Sood Law Offices. He is also empanelled as Assisting Counsel with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee.

Alongside his litigation practice, Ankur writes on developments in Indian commercial and public law, particularly arbitration, company law and statutory interpretation. His work has appeared in peer-reviewed journals including the Asian International Arbitration Journal, the Indian Law Review and the International Company and Commercial Law Review, as well as commentary platforms such as Bar & Bench and IndiaCorpLaw. He has served as a peer reviewer for Conflict Resolution Quarterly (Wiley), and earlier on the editorial boards of the Berkeley Technology Law Journal and the National Law School Business Law Review.

Practice Areas

What the Chambers handles

The Chambers undertakes contentious work across the following areas, before the constitutional courts and tribunals.

01

Arbitration

Notices of invocation and pleadings, and applications for interim measures, appointment of arbitrators, and challenges to awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before arbitral tribunals, the High Court of Delhi and, on appeal, the Supreme Court of India.

02

Commercial Litigation

Civil suits for recovery, specific performance, injunction and declaration, and disputes arising from contracts, property and partnership, including matters before the commercial courts in Delhi, the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India.

03

Company Law

Proceedings under the Companies Act, 2013, including questions of oppression and mismanagement, before the National Company Law Tribunal, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and, in further appeal, the Supreme Court of India.

04

Constitutional and Public Law

Writ petitions under Articles 32 and 226, public-interest litigation, and matters concerning fundamental rights, federalism and the judicial review of State action, before the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India.

05

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

Corporate insolvency resolution and liquidation proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, including applications under Sections 7, 9 and 10, and challenges to resolution plans and orders of admission, before the National Company Law Tribunal, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and the Supreme Court of India.

06

Intellectual Property and Technology Law

Suits for infringement and passing off concerning trademarks, copyrights and related rights, and questions at the intersection of law and technology, including data protection and digital-market regulation, before the Intellectual Property Division of the High Court of Delhi and, on appeal, the Supreme Court of India.

07

Public Tenders and Government Contracts

Challenges to tender eligibility conditions and award decisions, blacklisting proceedings, and disputes arising from the termination or performance of government contracts, before the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India.

08

Regulatory and Tribunal Matters

Service-law matters before the Central Administrative Tribunal, competition matters before the Competition Commission of India, and consumer disputes before the consumer fora, with appeals reaching the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India.

09

Securities Law

Matters arising under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, and the regulations framed under it, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal and, in further appeal, the Supreme Court of India.

10

White-Collar and Enforcement Matters

Economic-offence and enforcement proceedings, including matters concerning attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, bail applications and quashing petitions, before the High Court of Delhi and, in appropriate cases, the Supreme Court of India.

Publications

Selected writing

Writing in legal journals and forums on arbitration, insolvency, constitutional law, intellectual property and technology law.

A River Became a Deity and a Person Between Two Hearings: Tamirabarani and the Turn to Spiritual Ecology
On the Madras High Court’s recognition of the Tamirabarani River as a legal person, and its use of faith as an expressive tool to strengthen environmental compliance.
Bar & Bench
2026
A Purposive Approach to Membership in Oppression and Mismanagement Cases
Examines the Supreme Court’s 2026 ruling that ‘membership’ in an oppression and mismanagement petition should be read through company law’s wider definition rather than its narrower membership-procedure provisions.
IndiaCorpLaw
2026
The Arbitration Practitioner’s Series: Beyond the Invocation Notice: A Purposive Interpretation of Section 21 of the Arbitration Act
A critique of the Supreme Court’s observation that a notice of invocation is not mandatory before arbitration can begin, arguing this sits uneasily with the Court’s own earlier rulings.
Bar & Bench
2026
If You Share, You Care? Legal Ramifications of Defamatory Retweets
Considers the Delhi High Court’s ruling that retweeting defamatory content can itself amount to publication, and argues for a more calibrated approach balancing reputation against free speech.
Bar & Bench
2024
Exposing Dark Patterns: Are They Harboring Anticompetitive Practices?
Argues that deceptive ‘dark pattern’ interface designs deserve scrutiny under competition law, drawing on enforcement actions against major technology platforms in the United States.
Berkeley Technology Law Blog
2024
Cox & Kings v. SAP India: Questioning the Use of the ‘Group of Companies’ Doctrine
18(2) Asian International Arbitration Journal, 167–174
A case comment on the Supreme Court’s referral of the ‘group of companies’ doctrine, used to bind non-signatories to an arbitration agreement, examined against comparable positions abroad.
Asian Int’l Arbitration Journal
2023
High Court’s Power to Hold a Supreme Court Judgment ‘Per Incuriam’ and ‘Sub-Silentio’?: A Pressing Concern in Haris KM v. Jahfar
15(2) NUJS Law Review
Argues that the Kerala High Court ought not to have treated a binding Supreme Court judgment as ‘per incuriam’ and ‘sub-silentio’, given the discipline Article 141 is meant to impose.
NUJS Law Review
2022
Extinguishment of Liability under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code in India: Resolving the Conflict with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act
33(10) International Company and Commercial Law Review, 527–537
Looks at the recurring conflict between the resolution framework under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the Enforcement Directorate’s attachment powers under anti-money-laundering law.
Int’l Company & Commercial Law Review
2022
Recent Developments Concerning Arbitrability of IPR Disputes in India: A Need for Reform
5(1) Indian Law Review, 1–18
Reviews the inconsistent, largely judge-made law on whether intellectual property disputes can be referred to arbitration in India, and argues for legislative reform.
Indian Law Review
2021
Indus Biotech v. Kotak: A Step in the Right Direction?
Analyses the Supreme Court’s ruling that an arbitration petition cannot proceed once an insolvency resolution petition against the same company has been admitted.
IndiaCorpLaw
2021
Trump or No Trump, the Battle for Special and Differential Treatment at the WTO Isn’t Going Away
Traces the push to limit which countries can claim differential treatment as developing nations at the WTO, and argues for a sector-specific approach better suited to economies like India’s.
The Wire
2020

Titles link to the published version.

Notable Judgments

Judgments & orders

A selection of reported judgments and significant orders in matters handled by the Chambers, with a short note on the point of law each decides.

Supreme Court of India
G. Sita Ram Chander v. Tummala Suresh Chandra Chatterjee
After a batch of appeals had been dismissed, the review petitions filed against that dismissal were allowed in a manner that effectively re-heard the matter on its merits. The Supreme Court held that a review cannot be used as a disguised appeal, and that an order which re-opens the merits travels beyond the limited contours of review jurisdiction and must be set aside, along with any judgment passed in reliance on it.
2026 INSC 906
Supreme Court
Aug 2026
Mr. Nilesh Shah & Ors. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
A mutual fund’s asset manager had extended the maturity of its schemes in breach of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, and defended itself on the ground that investors had suffered no loss and had in fact gained. The Supreme Court held that once a breach of the regulations is established the penalty must follow, and that it is no defence to say the investors ultimately gained, since the rules exist to be obeyed regardless of the outcome.
2026 INSC 681
Supreme Court
Jul 2026
State of Tamil Nadu v. Ponnusamy & Ors.
In a murder arising from a long-running land dispute, the High Court had acquitted the accused, partly on the view that making them re-enact the crime for the investigators violated their right against self-incrimination. The Supreme Court restored the conviction, holding that a re-enactment which involves only physically demonstrating the sequence of events does not violate that right, though such evidence can only support other proof and cannot by itself be the basis of a conviction.
2026 INSC 507
Supreme Court
May 2026
Nagaraj V. Mylandla v. PI Opportunities Fund-I & Ors.
Judgment debtors resisting the enforcement in India of a Singapore-seated arbitral award sought to raise objections that had already been determined by the courts of the seat. The Supreme Court applied the doctrine of transnational issue estoppel to hold that issues finally decided by the seat court cannot be reopened at the enforcement stage, reaffirming that a court under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not sit in appeal over a foreign award.
2026 INSC 298
Supreme Court
Mar 2026
Pannalal Bhansali v. Bharti Telecom Limited & Ors.
Minority shareholders challenged a selective reduction of share capital that compulsorily extinguished their holdings in the company. The Supreme Court held that Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013 permits such a selective reduction and does not require a registered valuer’s report, and that, absent a misleading notice, unfair prejudice or perversity in the valuation, the courts will not interfere with what is essentially a commercial decision sanctioned by a special resolution and confirmed by the Tribunal.
2026 INSC 213
Supreme Court
Mar 2026
BPL Limited v. Morgan Securities and Credits Private Limited
A party challenged an arbitral award that had enforced a contractually agreed rate of interest of 36% per annum, contending that the rate was penal and unconscionable. The Supreme Court held that the opening words of Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 give effect to party autonomy, so that a tribunal cannot vary a rate the parties have themselves agreed, and that a rate settled between commercial parties of equal bargaining strength cannot later be assailed as penal or contrary to public policy.
2025 INSC 1380
Supreme Court
Dec 2025
High Court of Delhi
Ashutosh K.R. Pandey v. Union Public Service Commission & Anr.
An application before the Tribunal challenging a recruitment decision was brought after an inordinate and largely unexplained delay. The High Court held that the merits of a matter can be examined only once the delay is condoned, and that condonation remains a matter of judicial discretion rather than of right, which cannot be secured merely by offering to pay costs.
2026:DHC:9075-DB
Delhi High Court
Oct 2026
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Sunil Kumar Gupta
The Tribunal had set aside an employee’s transfer on the footing that his office in a recognised association conferred an absolute immunity from transfer. The High Court held that such immunity is not absolute but remains subject to administrative exigencies, and that an order proceeding on the assumption of absolute immunity, without regard to the governing rules and instructions, could not be sustained.
2026:DHC:8416-DB
Delhi High Court
Sep 2026
Mohammad Anees & Ors. v. National Education Society for Tribal Students & Ors.
Candidates selected as teachers had their candidature cancelled on the ground that they had pursued two degrees simultaneously, one through regular mode and the other through distance mode. The High Court held that the UGC norms, as subsequently clarified, permit such simultaneous study and treat qualifications so obtained before their issuance as valid, and directed that the cancellations be reconsidered in light of that clarified position.
2026:DHC:5303-DB
Delhi High Court
Jul 2026
Intercode Solutions Private Limited & Anr. v. Armor India Coding and Imaging Supplies Private Limited
An arbitral tribunal had terminated the proceedings on the ground that overlapping issues were pending before a civil court. The High Court set that order aside, holding that the power to terminate under Section 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is a narrow, residual one, and that neither an overlap of issues nor the filing of a defence in a parallel suit, with arbitration rights reserved, renders the arbitration unnecessary or impossible.
2026:DHC:107
Delhi High Court
Jan 2026
CCL ‘K’ v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The question arose whether a child alleged to be in conflict with law could be tried jointly with an adult co-accused in the same proceeding. The High Court held that Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 prohibits such joint proceedings, and that the trial of the child must be conducted separately and independently of the trial of the adult.
2025:DHC:1386
Delhi High Court
Mar 2025
VLCC Personal Care Limited v. M/s Uday Enterprises
A petition sought the appointment of a sole arbitrator under an agreement that reserved the power of appointment to one of the parties alone. The High Court held that such a unilateral power of appointment is impermissible, and, the existence of the arbitration agreement being clear, appointed an independent arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes.
2024:DHC:8156
Delhi High Court
Oct 2024
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. www.Haute24.com & Ors.
The proprietor of a luxury brand sued an online reseller that had used the brand’s own copyrighted product photographs without authorisation. The High Court restrained the unauthorised use of those images and required the reseller to disclose that its goods were certified pre-owned, while permitting it to continue dealing in genuine pre-owned products, and decreed the suit on admission.
2024:DHC:6352
Delhi High Court
Aug 2024

Each matter links to the judgment on Indian Kanoon.

In the Press

In the press

Significant and ongoing matters that have been reported in the legal and national press.

A constitutional challenge to a Parsi excommunication rule (Dina Budhraja v. Nagpur Parsi Panchayat & Ors.)
A petition under Article 32 challenges a Nagpur Parsi Panchayat rule under which a Parsi woman who marries outside the community ceases to be recognised as Parsi and is denied entry to the fire temple. The matter raises questions of equality, dignity and religious freedom under Articles 14, 21 and 25, including the gender disparity between the treatment of Parsi women and men who marry outside the faith.
Reported in ThePrint
Supreme Court
Mar 2026
A public interest challenge to the Consumer Protection Act’s “substantial question of law” provisions (N. Priyamvada & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.)
A public interest litigation challenges the constitutional validity of provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 that empower the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, sitting through benches that may include non-judicial members, to decide substantial questions of law. The petition contends that such adjudication belongs to the constitutional courts, and the Delhi High Court has issued notice to the Union of India.
Reported in LiveLaw
Delhi High Court
May 2026

Each matter links to the original report.

Contact

Get in touch

For enquiries, please write to the Chambers using the details below.

Chambers
Chambers of Ankur Singhal
A-42 (Second Floor), East of Kailash
New Delhi, 110065
View on Google Maps
Chat on WhatsApp

This message is sent directly to the Chambers. Submitting it does not create a lawyer–client relationship.